Skip to content Skip to sidebar Skip to footer

[DOWNLOAD] "Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander" by Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals * Book PDF Kindle ePub Free

Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander

📘 Read Now     📥 Download


eBook details

  • Title: Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander
  • Author : Fifth Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals
  • Release Date : January 28, 2000
  • Genre: Law,Books,Professional & Technical,
  • Pages : * pages
  • Size : 65 KB

Description

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana Appellant Bayou Fleet, Inc. appeals from the district court's order granting Mary and Neal Clulee's motion to amend the partial final consent judgment and the district court's final judgment dismissing Bayou Fleet's claims with prejudice. Bayou Fleet filed this action against Ellis Alexander; St. Charles Parish; the Parish's insurer, Coregis Insurance Company; Neal Clulee and his wife Mary Clulee (""the Clulees""); and the Clulees' two companies, Home Place Batture Leasing, Inc. (""Home Place"") and N/C Materials, Inc. Bayou Fleet alleged that the defendants conspired to eliminate it from the sand pit business through challenges to its zoning status and through attempts to persuade authorities against issuing permits. Specifically, Bayou Fleet alleged that the defendants abused its constitutional rights through a civil conspiracy under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and violated the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1 and 2, and the Louisiana Unfair Trade Practices Act, La. Rev. Stat. Ann. § 51:1401, et seq., through their efforts to put its sand pit operation out of business. Before trial, Bayou Fleet settled with Alexander, St. Charles Parish, and Coregis Insurance Company. In lieu of the settlement, the court entered a consent judgment, but later amended portions of the judgment that pertained to Bayou Fleet's zoning status. At the close of a non-jury trial, the district judge denied Bayou Fleet relief against the Clulees, holding that the Clulees were immune from liability under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine. See Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander, 68 F. Supp. 2d. 734, 744 (E.D. La. 1999). Bayou Fleet argues on appeal that the trial court effectively denied its First Amendment right of access to the courts, abused its discretion by amending the consent judgment, and erred in its dismissal of the case under the Noerr-Pennington doctrine.


Free PDF Books "Bayou Fleet, Inc. v. Alexander" Online ePub Kindle